Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gonzalez v. Citizens Financial Group et al
as 1:2024cv01285
Plaintiff:
Edwin Gonzalez
Defendant:
Citizens Financial Group, Citizens Bank, N.A., Bruce Van Saun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Gonzalez-Roblero v. Garland
as 22-6574
Petitioner:
EDWIN GONZALEZ-ROBLERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzalez v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2021cv06721
Plaintiff:
Edwin Gonzalez
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, Suffolk County Police Department, Christopher Nee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez v. Garland
as 20-3869
Petitioner:
EDWIN GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Burton et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv02902
Defendant:
Police Officers "John Does 1-10", Police Officer Wilson Caro, Police Officer Michael Temperino and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Burton, Kenny Dorcean, Edwin Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez v. Harrigan et al
as 1:2012cv04441
Defendant:
City of New York, P.O. Dennis Harrigan and P.O. John Doe
Plaintiff:
Edwin Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Padilla (Camacho)
as 11-5448
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Angel Padilla, AKA Cuson, James Albizu, AKA Pito, Roberto Colon, AKA Papo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Steven Camacho, AKA Spanky, AKA Spank
United States of America v. Padilla (Rodriguez)
as 11-5443
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Angel Padilla, AKA Cuson, James Albizu, AKA Pito, Roberto Colon, AKA Papo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Steven Camacho, AKA Spanky, AKA Spank and Jaime Rodriguez, AKA Jay
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
