Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hancock v. County of Rensselaer
as 16-2888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Keith Hancock, Tamera Thomas and Jason Dessingue
Defendant - Appellee:
Elaine Young, County of Rensselaer and Jack Mahar
Defendant:
James Karam, Anthony Patricelli and David Hetman
Momrow v. The County of Rensselaer et al
as 8:2015cv00521
Plaintiff:
Charles Momrow
Defendant:
The County of Rensselaer , Jack Mahar , Elaine Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Rensselaer County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2014cv01162
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rogers
Defendant:
Rensselaer County Sheriff's Department , Jack Mahar , Katrina Dinan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snyder v. The County of Rensselaer et al
as 1:2014cv00242
Plaintiff:
David Snyder
Defendant:
The County of Rensselaer, Jack Mahar and Elaine Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock et al v. County of Rensselaer et al
as 1:2013cv01184
Plaintiff:
Keith Hancock , Tamera Thomas and Jason Dessingue
Defendant:
County of Rensselaer , James Karam, Anthony Patricelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pasinella et al v. The County of Rensselaer et al
as 1:2013cv00607
Plaintiff:
Dominic Pasinella and Marjorie Pasinella
Defendant:
The County of Rensselaer , Jack Mahar , Ron LaFountain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pineboard Holdings, Inc v. Elden Associates, Inc.
as 13-945
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Pineboard Holdings, Inc, Per Local Civ R. 372 and Rule 2.F of Hon.Katherine B. Forrest's individual Practices, Plaintiff request order compelling deposition of a nonparty NY resident in U.S. Dist. Ct., C.D. Cal. action, CV1210912 MWF
Appellant:
Paul Parmar
Defendant:
Elden Associates, Inc., Elaine Young and Dennis Young
Pineboard Holdings ,Inc v. Elden Associates, Inc.; et al
as 1:2013mc00043
Plaintiff:
Pineboard Holdings ,Inc
Defendant:
Elden Associates, Inc., Elaine Young and Dennis Young
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
