Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Pastreich v. Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04223
Defendant:
Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Manny Pastreich and Trustees of the Building Service 32BJ Health Fund, Building Service 32BJ Legal Services Fund, and Building Service 32BJ Supplemental Retirement and Savings Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Rodriguez v. Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.
as 1:2023cv08355
Plaintiff:
Pedro Rodriguez
Defendant:
Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Komatsu v. United States of America
as 23-95
Petitioner:
Towaki Komatsu
Respondent:
United States of America, Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc., Court Security Officer Laptop and others
Komatsu v. United States of America
as 21-1667
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc., Court Security Officer Laptop and others
Gallo v. Inter-Con Security
as 1:2020cv04879
Defendant:
Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc. and Inter-Con Security
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Gallo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01395
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10999
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 41 U.S.C. § 251
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
