Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Okongwu v. County of Erie
as 21-2601
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Emeka Dominic Okongwu
Defendant / Appellee:
County of Erie
Defendant:
Chris Collins, and his successors, in their official capacities as Erie County Excutive, Timothy B. Howard, individually and as official of the Erie County Sheriff's Office, Richard T. Donovan, and his successors, in their official capacities as Erie County Undersheriff and others
Okongwu v. County of Erie
as 21-1025
Defendant:
Child and Adolescent Treatment Services of Buffalo, Jen Henry, individually and as official of Child and Adolescent Treatment Services of Buffalo, John Does 51-60, individually and in their official capacities as officers, investigators, employees, and staff of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services, the names of which are currently unknown and others
Defendant / Appellee:
County of Erie
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Emeka Dominic Okongwu
Rowenhorst et al v Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2018cv12387
Plaintiff:
Haleema Salie, Kathy Buell, John Doe 64 and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Ortiz et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12274
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Phillips, Vernessa Richard, Cristobal Lopez and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Keitt v. John/Jane Doe #4
as 17-1615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Devin Keitt
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Brian S. Fischer, as Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional Services, State of New York and others
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, #4, as Chancellor of New York City Department of Education, John/Jane Doe, #1, as Principal of Public School 236, John/Jane Doe, #2, Dean and others
Keitt v. John/Jane Doe #4 et al
as 1:2009cv08508
Plaintiff:
Devin Keitt
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #4, John/Jane Doe # 1, John/Jane Doe # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
