Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Heine et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv04592
Defendant: The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff: George Heine, Elizabeth Jackson, Nancy Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Vanyo v. The Town of Lancaster et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff: Michael A Vanyo
Defendant: The Town of Lancaster, Officer Richard Albert and Christopher Keppner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Global Weather Productions, LLC v. T&L of the Southtowns, Ltd et al
as 1:2024cv00111
Plaintiff: Global Weather Productions, LLC
Defendant: T&L of the Southtowns, Ltd doing business as SERVPRO of The Southtowns and ABC Corp. doing business as SERVPRO of West Seneca/Lancaster
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
59 Murray Enterprises, Inc. v. The City of New York
as 24-636
Plaintiff: 59 MURRAY ENTERPRISES, INC., AKA 59 Murray Corp., DBA New York Dolls, 59 MURRAY CORP., DBA New York Dolls, AAM HOLDING CORP., DBA Private Eyes and others
Defendant: CITY OF NEW YORK, RICK D. CHANDLER, as Commissioner of Buildings of the City of New York, BILL DE BLASIO, as Mayor of the City of New York and others
689 Eatery, Corp. v. The City of New York
as 24-640
Plaintiff: 689 EATERY, CORP., DBA Satin Dolls, MLB ENTERPRISES, CORP., a New York Corporation, DBA Lace and 725 EATERY, CORP., Substituting for MLB Enterprises, Corp., DBA Platinum Dolls
Defendant: CITY OF NEW YORK, a Municipal Corporation, RICK D. CHANDLER, as Commissioner of buildings of The City of New York, BILL DE BLASIO, as Mayor of the City of New York and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv06050
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 524 Bankruptcy: Effect of Discharge
Borozny et al. v. RTX Corporation, Pratt & Whitney Division, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01657
Plaintiff: David Granata, James Rowe, Stephen Dowe and others
Defendant: Pratt & Whitney, a Division of Raytheon Technologies Corporation, QuEST Global Services-NA, Inc., Belcan Engineering Group, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Tom Conroy, Christopher Novoa, Scott Prentiss and others
Consolidated Defendant: Belcan LLC, Co-Conspirator, Does 1-50 and others
Amicus Curiae: American Staffing Association
Interested Party: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Westchester County v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2023cv06096
Defendant: Indivior Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sandoz, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Westchester County, Westchester County NY and Westchester County, NY
Consolidated Plaintiff: Tioga County, Cattaraugus County, NY, Putnam County, NY and others
Consolidated Defendant: Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid of Maryland Inc. doing business as Mid-Atlantic Customer Support Center, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Town of Lancaster, NY v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv06130
Defendant: Indivior Inc., Assertio Therapeutics, Novartis AG and others
Plaintiff: Town of Lancaster, NY, Westchester County NY and Westchester County, NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Avon Nursing and Rehabilitation v. Azar
as 23-492
Plaintiff / Appellant: Avon Nursing and Rehabilitation, Brightonian Nursing and Rehabilitation, Woodside Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation and others
Defendant / Appellee: Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and Xavier Becerra, in his capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?