Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Menard et al
as 2:2024cv04149
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Marc Henry Menard and Laesha Jean-Louis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Burrell v. Bishop
as 24-1155
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
BISHOP, Deputy of Security, Sergeant LOCKE, Sergeant CONTO and others
Burrell v. Bishop
as 24-717
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
BISHOP, Deputy Security, Sergeant LOCKE, Sergeant CONTO and others
Serrano v. Locke et al
as 9:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Armani Serrano
Defendant:
N. Locke, A. Menard, J. LaTray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Isaac-Menard v. CIGNA Life Insurance Company of New York
as 1:2023cv02359
Plaintiff:
Rachel Isaac-Menard
Defendant:
CIGNA Life Insurance Company of New York and New York Life Group Insurance Company of NY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Burrell v. Bishop et al
as 9:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Bishop, Locke, Conto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Lilley et al
as 9:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Sabas Martinez
Defendant:
Lynn J. Lilley, Lefield, Captain T. Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holley v. Central New York Psychiatric Center et al
as 9:2022cv01119
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Holley, Jr.
Defendant:
Central New York Psychiatric Center, Donald Uhler, Reginald Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
