Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-273
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Villalabos et al v. RHG Manpower, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04670
Plaintiff:
Jose Villalabos and Oscar Amaya
Defendant:
RHG Manpower, Inc. and Menachem David Razon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04296
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Certain Interested Underwriters At Lloyd's London v. RHG Manpower Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03775
Plaintiff:
Certain Interested Underwriters At Lloyd's London
Defendant:
RHG Manpower Inc., Katherine Lefavre, Rockledge Scaffold Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07114
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Atienza v. American Healthcare Facility Management Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv08137
Plaintiff:
Michael Atienza
Defendant:
American Healthcare Facility Management Group, Inc., Axis Point Alternative Solutions, Inc., American Manpower Resource Provider, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Macolor v. Libiran et al
as 1:2014cv04555
Plaintiff:
Dustin Macolor
Defendant:
Rhandy R. Libiran, American Manpower Resource Provider Inc., Michael Urbino and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chin v. Chinatown Manpower Project et al
as 1:2011cv05270
Plaintiff:
Pearl Chin
Defendant:
Chinatown Manpower Project, William Leung, David Louie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Desiena et al. v. Manpower Incorporated of New York
as 2:2008cv03599
Plaintiff:
S. Desiena et al.
Defendant:
Manpower Incorporated of New York
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
