Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Smith v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Terry Smith
Defendant:
John Doe, P.O. Suprina, P.O. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nasca v. New York State Department of T
as 21-919
Defendant / Appellee:
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance and Michael Schmidt, in his offcial capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dean Nasca
Nasca v. New York State Department of Taxation and Finance et al
as 2:2020cv00243
Defendant:
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance and Michael Schmidt
Plaintiff:
Dean Nasca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAMBERS v. County Of Nassau et al
as 1:2019cv00158
Defendant:
County Of Nassau, Police Officer Mike Kamperveen, Police Officer Michael Schmidt and others
Plaintiff:
KRISTOFER CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. County Of Nassau et al
as 2:2019cv00158
Defendant:
County Of Nassau, Police Officer Mike Kamperveen, Police Officer Michael Schmidt and others
Plaintiff:
Kristofer Chambers and Kristofher Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Mackie et al
as 2:2017cv00765
Defendant:
Richard Ambro, Michael Henry, James Lydon and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The New York Times Company et al v. United States Department of Justice
as 1:2014cv00328
Plaintiff:
The New York Times Company and Michael Schmidt
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Monahan et al v. Schatz Steinway, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03835
Plaintiff:
Matthew Monahan, Marlon Pajaro, Willson Perez and others
Defendant:
Richard Plush, Schatz Steinway, Inc. and Alan Wilans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Alternative Investment Solutions (General) Limited v. Next Up Funding, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv06612
Plaintiff:
Alternative Investment Solutions (General) Limited
Defendant:
Next Up Funding, Inc., Jason E. Wright, Israel J. Hager and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Schmidt et al v. The Republic of Argentina
as 1:2009cv07059
Defendant:
The Republic of Argentina
Plaintiff:
Ute Kantner, U.V.A. Vaduz, Michael Schmidt and others
Interested Party:
Banco Central de la Republica Argentina and EUROCLEAR BANK SA/NV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
