Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Diaz v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv01844
Plaintiff:
Raymond Diaz
Defendant:
The City of New York, Mariela Ortega and Michael Monahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Long Island Rail Road
as 1:2015cv05622
Plaintiff:
Mr Raymond Diaz
Defendant:
Long Island Rail Road
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Pinter v. The City of New York
as 10-3789
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Robert Pinter
Defendant:
New York City Undercover Police Officers John Does, individually, New York City Polive Officers John Does, in their official capacities, Shari C. Hyman and others
Defendant - Appellant:
The City of New York, a municipal entity, New York City Undercover Police Officer #31107, NYC Police Comm. Raymond Kelly, individually and others
Ricardson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv09695
Plaintiff:
Paul Richardson
Defendant:
The City of New York, Undercover Police Officers # 3371, Undercover Police Officers # 3026 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reis v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv09694
Plaintiff:
Luiz Carlos Reis
Defendant:
The City of New York, Undercover Police Officers # 3371, Undercover Police Officers # 31107 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crosby et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv09693
Plaintiff:
Brad Crosby and Richard Daniels
Defendant:
The City of New York, Undercover Police Officers # 3371, Undercover Police Officers # 3026 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pinter v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv07841
Plaintiff:
Robert Pinter
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Undercover Police Officer #31107, New York City Police Officers John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
