Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Coppedge v. Elis
as 22-778
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Albert Coppedge
Defendant / Appellee:
Ruthie Elis and Judge Saladino
Harris v. Outsource Receivables Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01273
Plaintiff:
Ruthy A. Harris
Defendant:
Outsource Receivables Management, Inc. and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Michael Grecco Productions, Inc. v. RADesign, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv08381
Defendant:
RADesign, Inc., Davis by Ruthie Davis, Inc., Ruthie Allyn Davis and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Michael Grecco Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02453
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Abitbol et al v. Datalot Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00024
Defendant:
Kumparison, LLC, SBBNet, Inc., Datalot Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ruthy A. Harris and David Abitbol
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hobes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01285
Plaintiff:
Ruthie E Hobes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01637
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wright et al v. Publishers Clearing House, Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02373
Plaintiff:
Linda Phillips, Cheryl Rife, Ruth Ortiz Soudjian and others
Defendant:
Publisher's Clearing House LLC, Publisher's Clearing House, Inc, Publishers Clearing House, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
