Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Tang v. Canning
as 24-455
Plaintiff:
JOHN YONG TANG, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and FARIS AL KOOHEJI, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant:
SUSAN M. CANNING, ALAN D. FELDMAN, MICHAEL F. HINES and others
Tang et al v. CITIC Capital Holdings Ltd. et al
as 1:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
John Yong Tang and Faris Al Kooheji
Defendant:
CITIC Capital Holdings Ltd., CITIC Limited, CITIC Capital Partners LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Harris v. Meyer
as 21-2590
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Beverly M. Harris, Dr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Maria S. Meyer, Owner of Inter-Global Aviation, Anton Meyer, Manager/Operator of Inter-Global Aviation and Rosa Meyer, Manager/Operator
Harris v. Meyer
as 20-604
Defendant / Appellee:
Anton Meyer, Manager/Operator of Inter-Global Aviation, Rosa Meyer, Manager/Operator and Maria S. Meyer, Owner of Inter-Global Aviation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Beverly M. Harris, Dr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00925
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Harris v. Meyer et al
as 3:2019cv00205
Defendant:
Anton Meyer, Rosa Meyer and Maria S. Meyer
Plaintiff:
Dr. Beverly M. Harris and Beverly M. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. Meyer et al
as 1:2019cv01015
Defendant:
Anton Meyer, Rosa Meyer and Maria S. Meyer
Plaintiff:
Dr. Beverly M. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-993
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3562
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
