Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Trevo Dash v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv06808
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Trevo D Dash and Sean Michael D. Trevo Dash
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Payne et al v. Theory Entertainment LLC et al
as 1:2022cv06308
Plaintiff:
Duawn Payne and Harrell James
Defendant:
THEORY ENTERTAINMENT LLC d/b/a 300 ENTERTAINMENT, 1501 Certified Entertainment, Universal Music Publishing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Murray v. DCH Toyota City
as 7:2020cv07383
Defendant:
DCH Toyota City, DCH Auto Group and Toyota City, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Murray
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Miles v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01245
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sears v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2020cv00942
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Sears
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Boland v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv01391
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Boland
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
