Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 136
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Ipanaque et al
as 1:2024cv04357
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: Eynat Haroche Ipanaque Individually, and as officers, directors, shareholders and/or principals of Sympatoch Cafe Inc. d/b/a The Spot Hookah Lounge, Emil Azer Individually, and as officers, directors, shareholders and/or principals of Sympatoch Cafe Inc. d/b/a The Spot Hookah Lounge and Sympatoch Cafe Inc. d/b/a The Spot Hookah Lounge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MB Food Processing, Inc. v. Fedhal et al
as 7:2024cv02989
Plaintiff: MB Food Processing, Inc.
Defendant: Abdelkader Fedhal, Individually, Abdelkader Fedhal, Individually, and as officer, director, shareholder and/or principal of Fresh Farm One, Inc., Ali Fedhal, Individually and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP v. The Committee to Restore NYMOX Shareholder Value Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv02134
Plaintiff: Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP
Defendant: The Committee to Restore NYMOX Shareholder Value Inc., Randall J. Lanham, M. Richard Cutler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Zuffa, LLC v. Joseph et al
as 3:2024cv00436
Defendant: Gregory Joseph Individually, and as officer, director, shareholder, principal, manager and/or member of Waverly Bowling Co. LLC doing business as Valley Bowling Center also known as Strike Shack Tiki Bar, Waverly Bowling Co. LLC doing business as Valley Bowling Center also known as Strike Shack Tiki Bar and Strike Shack Tiki Bar
Plaintiff: Zuffa, LLC doing business as Ultimate Fighting Championship
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Theft of Cable Services
Gem Financial Service, Inc. v. City of New York
as 23-7298
Plaintiff / Appellee: GEM FINANCIAL SERVICE, INC.
Plaintiff: MITCHELL KAMINSKY, (a majority shareholder of GEM Financial Service, Inc.) and KEITH WATTS
Defendant: NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE #1-10
Defendant / Appellant: CITY OF NEW YORK
Kalinski v. Dutchess School of Driving, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2023cv08881
Plaintiff: Christopher W. Kalinski
Defendant: Dutchess School of Driving, Inc., Isa Marinaro, Maria Dominijanni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Gem Financial Service, Inc. v. City of New York
as 23-1205
Plaintiff: Mitchell Kaminsky, (a majority shareholder of GEM Financial Service, Inc.) and Keith Watts
Plaintiff / Appellee: Gem Financial Service, Inc., DBA Gem Pawnbrokers
Defendant: New York City Police Department and Police Officers John Doe #1-10
Defendant / Appellant: City of New York
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Rosales, Sr. et al
as 7:2023cv08217
Plaintiff: Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant: Rolando Rosales, Sr., Individually, Rolando Rosales, Sr., Individually, and as officer, director, shareholder and/or principal of Pisco Sour Bar & Restaurant Inc, Pisco Sour Bar & Restaurant Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Zuffa, LLC v. Theobald et al
as 5:2023cv00832
Plaintiff: Zuffa, LLC doing business as Ultimate Fighting Championship
Defendant: Stephen Theobald Individually, and as officer, director, shareholder, principal, manager, and/or member of CHUCKS FUTURE, LLC d/b/a HUNGRY CHUCKS and Chucks Future LLC doing business as Hungry Chucks
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Theft of Cable Services
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Cavanagh et al
as 7:2023cv05767
Plaintiff: Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant: John Cavanagh, Individually, John Cavanagh, Individually, and as officer, director, shareholder and/or principal of 1490 Restaurant Corp, John Hayes, Individually and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?