Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mitchell v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv04466
Plaintiff:
Stephen T. Mitchell
Defendant:
The City of New York, Laura Neubauer, Esq. and Michael Pesce, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv04465
Plaintiff:
Stephen T. Mitchell
Defendant:
The City of New York, Esq. Patrick Cappock and Esq. Daniel Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. The State of New York
as 23-705
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stephen T. Mitchell
Defendant / Appellee:
The State of New York and Leticia James, the Attorney General for the State of New York
Mitchell v. James et al
as 1:2022cv03791
Plaintiff:
Stephen T. Mitchell
Defendant:
Letitia James, Esq., State of New York, Eric Gonzalez, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2022cv01747
Plaintiff:
Stephen T. Mitchell
Defendant:
The State of New York and Letitia James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. New York State Division of Parole
as 1:2019cv03980
Respondent:
New York State Division of Parole
Petitioner:
Stephen T. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. New York State Division of Parole
as 1:2019cv05978
Respondent:
New York State Division of Parole
Petitioner:
Stephen T. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell v. Ward
as 17-1892
Petitioner - Appellant:
Stephen T. Mitchell
Respondent - Appellee:
Joe Ward, Superintendent
In Re: Mitchell, Esq.
as 1:2010mc00460
Respondent:
Stephen T. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: Disciplinary Proceedings
Mitchell et al v. Moore et al
as 1:2007cv11301
Plaintiff:
Stephen T. Mitchell and Stephen T. Mitchell, P.C.
Defendant:
Matricia Moore, Consolidated Edison and The New York State Worker's Compensation Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
