Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Sundaram v. Macys Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03275
Plaintiff:
Durgamritha Sundaram and Durgamritha T. Sundaram
Defendant:
Macys Inc., Overstock.com, Inc., Sears, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sundaram v. Belk, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03258
Plaintiff:
Durgamritha Sundaram and Durgamritha T. Sundaram
Defendant:
Belk, Inc., Belk Ecommerce LLC and Sycamore Partners LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sundaram v. Nordstrom Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03280
Plaintiff:
Durgamritha Sundaram and Durgamritha T. Sundaram
Defendant:
Nordstrom Inc., JD Fine & Co., Inc. and Nordstrom Inc. Individually doing business as Nordstrom Rack
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sundaram v. Monroe and Main, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03278
Plaintiff:
Durgamritha Sundaram and Durgamritha T. Sundaram
Defendant:
Monroe and Main, Inc., Midnight Velvet, Inc. and Montgomery Ward, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sundaram v. Eva Varro Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03264
Plaintiff:
Durgamritha Sundaram and Durgamritha T. Sundaram
Defendant:
Eva Varro Inc. and Dillards, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Stein v. Vocera Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00649
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Vocera Communications, Inc., Howard E. Janzen, John N. McMullen and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01209
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gordon v. Ravikumar et al
as 7:2016cv02034
Plaintiff:
David P. Gordon
Defendant:
Sundaram Ravikumar and Mini-Lap Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Moorjani et al
as 1:2013cv02247
Plaintiff:
Glynn Jones
Defendant:
Harish Moorjani, Sundaram Ravikumar and Mount Vernon Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Sundaram
as 1:2008cv07242
Plaintiff:
Mara Martinez
Defendant:
Ravikumar Sundaram, M.D.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
