Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Beyer, et al v. Al Qaeda Islamic
as 1:2002cv06978
Plaintiff:
Arlene Beyer, Susan Correa, Eileen Geraty and others
Defendant:
Al Qaeda Islamic Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 wd Diversity-Wrongful Death
Burke v. Touchette
as 22-1028
Petitioner / Appellant:
James Thomas Burke
Respondent / Appellee:
Mike Touchette, Commish, VT DOC, State of Vermont and David E. Tartter, Esq., Assist. Attorney General
Burke v. Touchette
as 22-896
Petitioner / Appellant:
James Thomas Burke
Respondent / Appellee:
Mike Touchette, Commish, VT DOC, State of Vermont and David E. Tartter, Esq., Assist. Attorney General
SMS Financial Strategic Investments III, LLC v. 249 West 49th Street, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv10884
Plaintiff:
SMS Financial Strategic Investments III, LLC
Defendant:
249 West 49th Street, LLC, Sheeli Aggarwal, Thomas Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Acevedo et al v. Burke et al
as 1:2021cv11053
Plaintiff:
Agustin Acevedo, Jose Gutierrez, Moises Aguilar and others
Defendant:
thomas burke, Francis McCole, Douglas Kaplan and others
Burke v. Touchette
as 20-229
Respondent:
David E. Tartter, Esq., Assist. Attorney General, Mike Touchette, Commish, VT DOC and State of Vermont
Petitioner:
James Thomas Burke
Burke v. Touchette et al
as 5:2019cv00228
Respondent:
Mike Touchette, David E. Tartter and State of Vermont
Petitioner:
James Thomas Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burke v. Touchette et al
as 2:2019cv00228
Respondent:
Mike Touchette, David E. Tartter and State of Vermont
Petitioner:
James Thomas Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brill et al v. kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11305
Plaintiff:
Vincent Chiarello, Michael Clark, Frank Cesario and others
Defendant:
kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
