Cases 1 - 10 of 545,498
In Re: Christopher Mongiello
as 7:2024cv02468
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Long Island Minimally Invasive Surgery P.C. v. DiSalvio
as 7:2024cv04446
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Drezek Management LLC v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv01035
Plaintiff:
Drezek Management LLC
Defendant:
Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Pons v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
Ramon Pons
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Fresh Funding Solutions, Inc. v. Digital Market Media, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Fresh Funding Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Digital Market Media, Inc., Thomas Anthony Carolan and Dawn Marie Carolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Madsen et al v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv01032
Plaintiff:
John E. Madsen, Jr. and Louise B. Madsen
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation and Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Young v. Pearson
as 3:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
Curly Henry Young
Defendant:
Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Breda v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv01031
Plaintiff:
Andrew John Breda, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arpin v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
Barry J. Arpin
Defendant:
Scott Semple and Henry Falcone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
