Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Does et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2024cv03042
Plaintiff:
John Does and Jane Does
Defendant:
New York City, Mayor Eric Adams, NYPD Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanborn v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc
as 1:2017cv03518
Plaintiff:
Sara Tess Sanborn and Robert Zinn
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer Oy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cheung v. Adorn Fashions, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv08054
Defendant:
Adorn Fashions, Inc. and Morris Zinn
Plaintiff:
Man Lei Cheung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Zinn v. Doe et al
as 3:2011cv01623
Plaintiff:
John Zinn
Defendant:
John Doe and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nowacki v. Malloy et al
as 3:2011cv01242
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Nowacki
Defendant:
Dannel Malloy, Andrew McDonald, Michael Lawlor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00445
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Gilman's Cleaners, Inc. v. Zinn et al
as 7:2010cv07703
Plaintiff:
Gilman's Cleaners, Inc.
Defendant:
Gary Zinn and Valley Dry cleaners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zinn et al v. Rhinebeck Central School District et al
as 7:2009cv00738
Plaintiff:
Frederic M Zinn and Carolynn A Finn
Defendant:
Rhinebeck Central School District and Joseph Phelan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
The Pennsylvania Avenue Funds v. INYX Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv06857
Plaintiff:
The Pennsylvania Avenue Funds and The Pennsylvania Avenue Funds
Defendant:
INYX Inc., Jack Kachkar, Steven Handley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Zinn v. Murphy
as 3:2007cv01001
Petitioner:
John Zinn
Respondent:
Peter J. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
