Cases 11 - 20 of 2,873
Jermaine Carter v. Shane Troxler
as 24-1953
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE L. CARTER
Defendant:
BUREAU CHIEF SHANE TROXLER
James Wolfe v. John Rivello, et al
as 24-1915
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. WOLFE
Defendant:
JOHN RIVELLO, Superintendent at SCI Huntingdon, BARBARA HOLLIBAUGH, Unit Manager at SCI Huntingdon, MARK GRIMME, Unit Manager at SCI Huntingdon and others
Jermaine Carter v. Calli Stubbs, et al
as 24-1937
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE L. CARTER
Defendant:
CALLI A. STUBBS, Medical Doctor and DOC, Commissioner
Ashley Georges v. Helen Godby, et al
as 24-1884
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY GEORGES
Defendant:
HELEN C. GODBY and YVONNE SMITH SEGARS
Christopher Hall v. Mark Wahl, et al
as 24-1525
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. HALL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MARK WAHL, UNIT MANAGER MICHAEL SKUTACK, UNIT MANAGER JOE D'EANGLES and others
Mark Woods v. Shawn Wills, et al
as 24-1928
Plaintiff:
MARK WOODS
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER SHAWN WILLS, #3680 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, P/O THOMAS STRAIN, #4005 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, P/O LT. HOYT, #225 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Steven Hill v. Camden County Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1486
Plaintiff:
STEVEN M. HILL
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CFG MEDICAL SERVICES
Clifton Williams v. George Little, et al
as 24-1903
Plaintiff:
CLIFTON WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GEORGE M. LITTLE, Unknown (Former Sec'y PA Dept. of Corrections (DOC)), LAUREL HARRY, Secretary PA Department of Corrections (DOC), KERI MOORE, Acting DOC Chief Grievance Officer and others
Abdush Dubose, et al v. Attorney General United States of America, et al
as 24-1815
Plaintiff:
ABDUSH DUBOSE, ZUMAR DUBOSE and KARIEM BASEER DUBOSE
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
