Cases 91 - 100 of 1,495
Santos Torres-Olan v. William O'Brien, et al
as 23-1514
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANTOS D. TORRES-OLAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. WILLIAM O'BRIEN, MICHAEL WATSON, RICHARD BEDNARO and others
Abraham Cruz v. Pennsylvania State Police, et al
as 23-1498
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABRAHAM CRUZ
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE and JUDGE DAVID R. CASHMAN
Martha Stringer, et al v. County of Bucks, et al
as 23-1373
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARTHA STRINGER and PAUL STRINGER
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF BUCKS, SERGEANT MANDER and JOHN DOES 1-20
Defendant / Appellant:
MR. ANDREW KOVACH and SERGEANT NIALL MANDER
Elijah Iverson v. USA
as 23-1391
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELIJAH IVERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Renaldo Robichaw v. Warden Philadelphia FDC, et al
as 23-1374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RENALDO MCPERCY ROBICHAW
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN PHILADELPHIA FDC, JOSEPH M. LYNCH, HSA, JANE DOE 1 and others
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC, KALLE BAXLEY, PSP, PEDRO ALDEBOL, PSP and others
Arthur Bomar v. Braunlich, et al
as 23-1160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR BOMAR
Defendant / Appellee:
BRAUNLICH
Steven Derk v. Michael Zaken, et al
as 23-1156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN C. DERK
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, SCI Greene
Quintez Talley v. Wetzel, et al
as 23-1120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN ROBERT GILMORE and others
Pascal Gedeon v. Attorney General, et al
as 22-3450
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PASCAL GEDEON
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Mustafa Ali v. Joseph Dupont, et al
as 22-3460
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MUSTAFA ALI
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH H. DUPONT, Chief Hearing Examiner, PA Dept. of Corrections and DR. HASPER, Psychiatrist, SCI Forest
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
