Cases 21 - 30 of 275
Emery Barron v. Wetzel, et al
as 23-1699
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMERY BARRON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS (DOC/PA), KEVIN RANSOM, WARDEN OF SCI-DALLAS, S. MILLER, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT FOR CENTRALIZED SERVICE and others
Quintez Talley v. Clark, et al
as 23-1611
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
MAJOR CLARK, Major, LAURA BANTA, MCKENZIE NASH and others
Glavin Ivy v. John Wetzel, et al
as 23-1589
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLAVIN IVY
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN WETZAL, LAUREN BLAKE, J. WINTERS and others
Bart Yagla, Jr. v. County of Fayette, et al
as 23-1508
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BART M. YAGLA, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF FAYETTE, JOHN LENKEY, JOE BARNES, Deputy Warden of Security and others
Martha Stringer, et al v. County of Bucks, et al
as 23-1373
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARTHA STRINGER and PAUL STRINGER
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF BUCKS, SERGEANT MANDER and JOHN DOES 1-20
Defendant / Appellant:
MR. ANDREW KOVACH and SERGEANT NIALL MANDER
Quintez Talley v. Wetzel, et al
as 23-1120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN ROBERT GILMORE and others
Quintez Talley v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 22-3337
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, FAYETTE COUNTY, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Alexander Peterson v. Gina Orlando, et al
as 22-3013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER PETERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GINA ORLANDO, SCI-PHX Staff and (JOHN DOE) C/O GUARD PURIFOY
Albert Korb v. Sgt. Haystings, et al
as 22-2832
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT B. KORB
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. HAYSTINGS, JOHN E. WETZEL, SRC DOC and MIKE CLARK, Superintendent Albion
Alton Brown v. Tom Wolf, et al
as 22-2751
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM WOLF, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DR. A. SANTOS and others
Debtor / Appellee:
MINDY ANDRETTI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
