Cases 31 - 40 of 92
William Staples v. USA, et al
as 16-1391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM STAPLES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHARLES SAMUEL, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator of National Inmate Appeals and others
Stephen Aguiar v. M. Recktenwald, et al
as 16-1236
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN M. RECKTENWALD, Warden, JEFF BUTLER, Associate Warden, C BERGEN, Captain and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN AGUIAR
Lamar Coleman v. Warden Allenwood FCI, et al
as 15-4102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAMAR COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Terry Middleton v. USA
as 15-3412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY MIDDLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Federal Bureau of Prisons
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 15-2948
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, And all its agents, employees, contractors and custodian
Sebastian Richardson v. Director Federal Bureau of Pri, et al
as 15-2876
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEBASTIAN RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Stephen Smith v. Maiorana, et al
as 15-2591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN R. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN MAIORANA, MR. WRIGHT, DR. FARKUS, DMP and others
Leonidas Fields v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 15-2365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONIDAS R. FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN ZICKERFOOSE, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Hurgenes Pignard v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 15-2369
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HURGENES PIGNARD
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Linwood Wilkerson v. Charles Samuels, et al
as 15-1872
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINWOOD WILKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, SMOKER, Correctional Officer, LSCI-Allenwood and SOLOMAN, Factory Manager, LSCI-Allenwood
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.