Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Bernard Jerry-El v. Superintendent Laurel Highland, et al
as 17-3682
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERNARD CARTER JERRY-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HIGHLANDS SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
George Durham v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 17-3605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE M. DURHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
William Vukich v. Commonwealth of Beaver County, et al
as 17-2885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM E. VUKICH
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF BEAVER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Terel Dixon v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 17-2261
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEREL DARNELL DIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
William Vukich v. Court of Common Pleas, et al
as 17-1761
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM E. VUKICH
Defendant - Appellee:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Beaver County, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and others
In re: Gary Robinson
as 17-1648
Petitioner:
In re: GARY ROBINSON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
In re: George Durham
as 17-1466
Petitioner:
In re: GEORGE M. DURHAM
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
George Durham v. Superintendent Pittsburgh SCI, et al
as 16-3453
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE M. DURHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT PITTSBURGH SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
George Durham v. Superintendent Pittsburgh SCI, et al
as 16-3304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE M. DURHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT PITTSBURGH SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
Terel Dixon v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 16-2584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEREL DARNELL DIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
