Cases 21 - 30 of 75
Bill Williams v. City of Allentown, et al
as 19-1444
Defendant:
CITY OF ALLENTOWN, GLEN DORNEY and GAIL STRUSS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BILL WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellant:
KEITH MORRIS and ED PAWLOWSKI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3727
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 17-3026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, DARRELL O. DUGAN, WILLIAM BRENNAN, Esq. and others
North American Biofuels Compan, et al v. C. Butler, II, et al
as 17-2756
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORTH AMERICAN BIOFUELS COMPANY NJ LLC and JOHN F LARKIN
Defendant - Appellee:
C. DAVID BUTLER, II, BILL MALONE and BRIDGEPORT BIODIESEL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. William Villella
as 17-2366
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM ANTHONY VILLELLA, aka FLASH VILLELLA, aka WILLIAM ANTHONY VILLILLA, aka JOHN SALEM, aka BILLY VILLELLA, aka JOHNNY SALEM, aka WM VILLELA, aka WILLIAM VELLELLA, aka BILLY V. VILLELLA, aka WILLIAM A. VILLELLA, aka BILL VILLELLA, aka WILLIAM VILLELA
Bill Dominguez v. Yahoo Inc
as 17-1243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILL H. DOMINGUEZ, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED
Defendant - Appellee:
YAHOO INC
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 16-3731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN KANE, BRIAN COLEMAN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 16-3731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, BRIAN COLEMAN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
