Cases 21 - 30 of 2,045
Jeffrey Chijioke-Uche v. Equifax Information Services LLC, et al
as 24-1690
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SOLOMON CHIJIOKE-UCHE
Defendant:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC, TRANSUNION LLC and others
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Jasper Frazier v. Victoria Kuhn, et al
as 24-1620
Plaintiff:
JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, Acting Commissioner, PATRICK NOGAN, Administrator, ANTHONY GONGI, Association Administrator and others
Michael Gorbey v. Geisinger Eye Center Owners & Rueters, et al
as 24-1590
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY, aka Michael Feather-Gorbey aka Michael Owl Feather Gorbey
Defendant:
GEISINGER EYE CENTER OWNERS & RUETERS, PATRICIA S. DODSZUWEIT, Clerk of Court U.S. App.Ct. 3rd Cir., J. OLSON, Ophthomology Doctor Geisinger Eye Center and others
Raj Patel v. United Parcel Services
as 24-1542
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
United Parcel Service Inc v. NLRB
as 24-1530
Petitioner:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Intervenor:
ROBERT C. ATKINSON, JR.
NLRB v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 24-1531
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Intervenor:
ROBERT C. ATKINSON, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
Trustmark Services Company v. Michael Feeney
as 24-1564
Plaintiff:
TRUSTMARK SERVICES CO
Defendant:
MICHAEL FEENEY
NewRez LLC v. Dean Plaskett, et al
as 24-1519
Plaintiff:
NEWREZ LLC, DBA Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Defendant:
DEAN C. PLASKETT, RAYMOND PLASKETT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Steven Hill v. Camden County Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1486
Plaintiff:
STEVEN M. HILL
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CFG MEDICAL SERVICES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
