Cases 21 - 30 of 44
John Greene v. Tim Sloane, et al
as 19-1734
Defendant / Appellee:
TIM SLOANE, WELLS FARGO CORPORATE CEO, BROAD STREET MINISTRY, WILMINGTON PUBLIC LIBRARY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN GREENE
Defendant:
ERIC WILLIAMS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL DISTRICT, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
John Greene v. Philadelphia School District, et al
as 19-1735
Defendant:
FAYE R. COHEN, JONATHAN VAN DUSEN, WALGREEN CO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN GREENE
Tanya Wilson v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 19-1530
Defendant / Appellee:
POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TANYA WILSON
Victoria Handle v. Postmaster General of the Unit, et al
as 19-1330
Defendant / Appellee:
POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTORIA HANDLE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2640
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
NLRB v. United States Postal Service
as 17-2561
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Dennis Campbell, et al
as 16-3790
Petitioner:
In re: DENNIS JOHN CAMPBELL and MINDY JAYE ZIED-CAMPBELL
Respondent:
POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Nominal Respondent:
JAN E. DUBOIS, HARVEY BARTLE, III and JAMES KNOLL GARDNER
Assem Abulkhair v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 15-1651
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASSEM A. ABULKHAIR
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
