Cases 31 - 40 of 586
Rocky Freeman v. J. Lincalis, et al
as 23-1566
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROCKY L. FREEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIT MANAGER J. LINCALIS, PROBATION OFFICER JOHN D. MCCARTHY, SUPERVISING U.S. PROBATION OFFICER STEPHEN L. BRIGHTON and others
Consol Pennsylvania Coal Co, et al v. Director Office of Workers Compensation Programs, et al
as 23-1892
Petitioner:
CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA COAL CO and CONSOL ENERGY INC
Respondent:
STEPHEN M. HELA and DIRECTOR OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1470
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1387
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Henry Stubbs, III v. Greg Skrepenak, et al
as 22-2277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY CHRISTOPHER STUBBS, III
Defendant / Appellee:
GREG SKREPENAK, TODD VONDERHEID, STEPHEN A URBAN and others
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES, THOMAS L. AMBRO and others
Michael Marrara, et al v. Philip D. Murphy, et al
as 23-1379
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MARRARA and MICHAEL DOTRO, Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
PHILIP DUNTON MURPHY, STEPHEN M. SWEENEY, CRAIG J. COUGHLIN and others
Stephen Brown v. USA
as 23-1426
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Reginald Stephens
as 23-1464
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
REGINALD STEPHENS
USA v. Stephen Corona
as 23-1472
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
STEPHEN C. CORONA
James Riffin v. New Freedom Borough, et al
as 23-1048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RIFFIN
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW FREEDOM BOROUGH, ANN SHEMO, DENNIS SARPEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
