Cases 31 - 40 of 1,281
Emru Kebede v. , et alIn re: Emru Kebede v. , et al
as 24-1214
Petitioner:
In re: EMRU KEBEDE
Respondent:
GEORGE LITTLE, Acting Secretary for the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SYLVIA H. RAMBO
Walter Chruby v. Kirk Bearjar, et al
as 24-1200
Plaintiff:
WALTER A. CHRUBY
Defendant:
KIRK BEARJAR, ANNETTE KOWALEWSKI, JENNIFER SHROCK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ronald Stockton v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1121
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY HUNTINGDON COUNTY and SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI
Secretary United States Department of Labor v. East Penn Manufacturing Inc
as 24-1059
Plaintiff:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Defendant:
EAST PENN MANUFACTURING INC
Secretary United States Department of Labor v. East Penn Manufacturing Inc
as 24-1046
Plaintiff:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Defendant:
EAST PENN MANUFACTURING INC
Anthony Custer v. Jason Green, et al
as 24-1013
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOSEPH CUSTER
Defendant:
JASON GREEN, CO-TRUSTEE OR CURRENT OCCUPANT, TIM REARDON, CO-TRUSTEE OR CURRENT OCCUPANT, GEORGE SOLIS and others
Michael Mokshefski v. Morris Houser, et al
as 23-3256
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOKSHEFSKI
Defendant:
MORRIS HOUSER, Superintendent SCI-Benner Township, BRADLEY BOOHER, Deputy Superintendent SCI-Benner Township, CURTIS D. GRICE, Deputy Superintendent SCI-Benner Township and others
Charles TalbertIn re: Charles Talbert
as 23-3228
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES TALBERT
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of PA Department of Corrections, SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HARRY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
