Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,963
David Stebbins v. Maraposa Surgical Inc, et al
as 24-1626
Plaintiff: DAVID W. STEBBINS
Defendant: MARAPOSA SURGICAL INC, d/b/a ALLEGHENY VEIN AND VASCULAR and ROBERT W. TAHARA, M.D.
Michael Gorbey v. Geisinger Eye Center Owners & Rueters, et al
as 24-1590
Plaintiff: MICHAEL STEVEN GORBEY, aka Michael Feather-Gorbey aka Michael Owl Feather Gorbey
Defendant: GEISINGER EYE CENTER OWNERS & RUETERS, PATRICIA S. DODSZUWEIT, Clerk of Court U.S. App.Ct. 3rd Cir., J. OLSON, Ophthomology Doctor Geisinger Eye Center and others
Bernard Ellerbe v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-1526
Plaintiff: BERNARD D. ELLERBE
Defendant: WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Kai Ingram v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, et al
as 24-1532
Plaintiff: KAI D. INGRAM
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1468
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Peter Seamon v. Governor Joshua Shapiro, et al
as 24-1451
Plaintiff: PETER R. SEAMON
Defendant: GOVERNOR JOSHUA D. SHAPIRO, NANCY WALKER, Secretary of Labor & Industry, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY and others
Eric Rhett v. Union County Social Services, et al
as 24-1386
Plaintiff: ERIC J. RHETT
Defendant: UNION COUNTY DIVISION OF SOCIAL SERVICES, HI TECH TRAINING SCHOOL, DEBBIE MYERS and others
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1357
Petitioner: In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1355
Petitioner: In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1356
Petitioner: In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?