Cases 51 - 60 of 190
In re: Hakeen Willi
as 16-2501
Petitioner:
In re: HAKEEN WILLIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Willie Sawyer
as 16-2412
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIE SAWYER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Hakeen Willi
as 16-2097
Petitioner:
In re: HAKEEN WILLIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ronald Johnson v. Ronald Johnson, et al
as 16-2105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD A. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD JOHNSON, IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES, KAREN JOHNSON, IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES, JOSEPH NIXON and others
John Dowling v. Pension Plan for Salaried Empl, et al
as 16-1977
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. DOWLING
Defendant - Appellee:
PENSION PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES OF UNION PACIFIC CORP AND AFFILLIATES, ROY SCHROER, NAMED FIDUCIARY-PLAN ADMINISTRATION OF THE PENSION PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES OF UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION AND ITS AFFILIATES, EDWIN A. WILLIS, DELEGATE OF THE NAMED FIDUCIARY-PLAN ADMINISTRATION OF THE PENSION PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES OF UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION AND AFFILIATES and others
In re: George Willie Buford
as 16-1878
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: GEORGE WILLIE BUFORD, III
Defendant - Respondent:
HARRELL WATTS, BOP NORTHEAST REGIONAL COUNSEL, WARDEN LEWISBURG USP and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
EDWIN M. KOSIK
In re: Willie Harris, Sr.
as 16-1793
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIE B. HARRIS, SR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Willie Davis v. Warden Lewisburg USP
as 16-1735
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP
Willie Davis v. Warden Lewisburg USP
as 16-1392
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP
Willie Young v. Dennis E. Reinaker, et al
as 15-3870
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE MACK YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
DENISE REINAKER, PRES., JUDGE, RICHARD SIMMS, DISTRICT JUSTICE, RICHARD GRAY, MAYOR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
