Cases 81 - 90 of 233
In re: James Roudabush, Jr.
as 16-2606
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Respondent:
DIRECTOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Donald Jackman, Jr. v. 5751 Unit Team Fort Dix, et al
as 16-1995
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD G. JACKMAN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
5751 UNIT TEAM FORT DIX, WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Kareem Millhouse v. Suzanne Heath, et al
as 16-1579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
SUZANNE HEATH, JAMES FOSNOT, DAVID EBBERT and others
William Staples v. USA, et al
as 16-1391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM STAPLES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHARLES SAMUEL, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator of National Inmate Appeals and others
Stephen Aguiar v. M. Recktenwald, et al
as 16-1236
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN M. RECKTENWALD, Warden, JEFF BUTLER, Associate Warden, C BERGEN, Captain and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN AGUIAR
Lamar Coleman v. Warden Allenwood FCI, et al
as 15-4102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAMAR COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Jose Rodriguez-Ramos v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 15-3630
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS RODRIGUEZ-RAMOS
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN FORT DIX FCI and FORT DIX FCI
Terry Middleton v. USA
as 15-3412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY MIDDLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Federal Bureau of Prisons
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Federal Bureau of Prison
as 15-2948
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, And all its agents, employees, contractors and custodian
Sebastian Richardson v. Director Federal Bureau of Pri, et al
as 15-2876
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEBASTIAN RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
