Cases 1 - 10 of 203
Derrick, et al v. Glen Mills Schools, et al
as 24-8018
Petitioner:
DERRICK, Through and With His Next Friend and Mother Tina, WALTER, Through and With His Next Friend and Mother Janeva and THOMAS, Through His Next Friend and Mother Michelle, On Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated
Respondent:
GLEN MILLS SCHOOLS, TERESA D. MILLER, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Human Services in Her Individual Capacity, THEODORE DALLAS, Former Secretary of The Department of Human Services in His Individual Capacity and others
Derrick Chapman v. Warden Schuylkill FCI
as 24-1944
Petitioner:
DERRICK DEANDRE CHAPMAN
Respondent:
WARDEN SCHUYLKILL FCI
Renee Chrustowski v. NAACP Derrick Johnson
as 24-1847
Plaintiff:
RENEE A. CHRUSTOWSKI
Defendant:
NAACP DERRICK JOHNSON
Derrick Jacobs v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 24-1696
Plaintiff:
DERRICK U. JACOBS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and others
USA v. Derrick Underdue
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DERRICK UNDERDUE, a/k/a Derek Underdue
Derrick Smith v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 23-3023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Renee Chrustowski v. NAACP, et al
as 23-2812
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RENEE CHRUSTOWSKI
Defendant:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, DERRICK JOHNSON, 80EIGHTY, LGND SUPPLY CO, Giovanni Petruzziello and others
Derrick EllerbeIn re: Derrick Ellerbe
as 23-2692
Petitioner:
In re: DERRICK J. ELLERBE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Derrick Evans v. TheHuffingtonPost.com Inc
as 23-2698
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK EVANS
Defendant / Appellee:
HUFFINGTON POST.COM INC and THEHUFFINGTONPOST.COM INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
