Cases 1 - 10 of 514
USA v. Dameia Smith
as 24-2020
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAMEIA O. SMITH, a/k/a Omar, a/k/a D
Pace O Matic Inc v. Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott LLC, et al
as 24-1984
Plaintiff:
PACE O MATIC INC
Defendant:
ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC, MARK S. STEWART and KEVIN M. SKJOLDAL
Appellant:
GREENWOOD GAMING AND ENTERTAINMENT INC, DBA Parx Casino
Mark Woods v. Shawn Wills, et al
as 24-1928
Plaintiff:
MARK WOODS
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER SHAWN WILLS, #3680 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, P/O THOMAS STRAIN, #4005 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, P/O LT. HOYT, #225 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Dwayne Rieco v. Michael Zaken, et al
as 24-1882
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, MARK HAMMER, Physicians Assistant, WILLIAM NICHOLSON and others
Consol Mining Co LLC, et al v. United States Department of Labor, et al
as 24-1873
Petitioner:
CONSOL MINING CO LLC and CONSOL ENERGY INC, c/o Sedgwick CMS
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and VONDA SILK, surviving spouse of Stanley D. Silk, deceased
Arthur ArmstrongIn re: Arthur Armstrong
as 24-8015
Petitioner:
In re: ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
Antonio Jones v. NJ Doc Central Transportation, et al
as 24-1758
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO JONES
Defendant:
NJ DOC CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION, DR. IHUOMA NWACHUKWU, M.D., DR. JAMES K. LIU, Rutgers Neurosurgeon and others
USA v. Lashaumba Randolph
as 24-1613
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LASHAUMBA O. RANDOLPH
William Webb, Jr. v. Kirk Neal, et al
as 24-1439
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOSEPH WEBB, JR.
Defendant:
KIRK NEAL, Corporal at SCI and C/O EDGAR VERDE
Karl Manuel v. Mark Capozza, et al
as 24-1396
Plaintiff:
KARL B. MANUEL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MARK CAPOZZA, C/O SERGEANT WILES, C/O. LT. DAILEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
