Cases 1 - 10 of 25
J. L. v. East Stroudsburg Area School District
as 23-3035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J. L., by and through his Guardian, Holly M. of East Stroudsburg, PA
Defendant / Appellee:
EAST STROUDSBURG AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2931
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jeidy Posadas-Ramos, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 22-2734
Petitioner:
JEIDY YORLENI POSADAS-RAMOS, H. J. L.-P. and O. E. L.-P.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nohemy Lopez-Reyes, et al v. Attorney General United States
as 20-1862
Petitioner:
E. J. L. L. and NOHEMY ESPERANZA LOPEZ REYES
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Anthony Carmichael v. John Thomson, et al
as 20-1252
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CAMDEN, ORLANDO CUEVAS, J. L. WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LT. ANTHONY CARMICHAEL
Township of Marlboro Board of v. H. L., et al
as 19-2199
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOWNSHIP OF MARLBORO BOARD OF EDUCATION
Defendant:
J. L., on behalf of V.L. and H. L.
Bryan Santini v. Joseph Fuentes, et al
as 17-2890
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN M. SANTINI
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH RICK FUENTES, COLONEL, J. L. FURHMANN, TROOPER, R. H. SICKLES, TROOPER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3863
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
J. L. v. Wyoming Valley West School Dis, et al
as 16-3727
Plaintiff - Appellant:
J. L., a minor, by and through his parents and legal guardians Fernando Leduc, his father, and Dorca Salaman, his mother
Defendant - Appellee:
WYOMING VALLEY WEST SCHOOL DISTRICT and WVW TRANSPORT INC, AKA AVP Transport Inc
Love Brooks v. Bryan Bledsoe, et al
as 16-2119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOVE ALTONIO BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN A. BLEDSOE, HUDSON, Associate Warden, S. SNYDER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
