Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Assem Abulkhair v. President USA, et al
as 12-3358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASSEM A. ABULKHAIR
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT USA, in his official capacity, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States, individually, ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, in his official capacity and others
Prince Adekoya, II v. Michael Chertoff, et al
as 11-1990
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRINCE A.Z.K. ADEKOYA, II
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al, CHRISTOPHER SHANAHAN, Field Office Director, DHS/ICE New York , New York., R LOPEZ, Deportation Officer, Detention and Removal Operation DHS/ICE New York , New York and others
Assem Abulkhair v. George Bush, et al
as 10-2812
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASSEM A. ABULKHAIR
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General of the United States, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Sassower v. Sisk, et al
as 09-2797
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE SASSOWER
Defendant - Appellee:
P. DOUGLAS SISK, SALLY MRVOS, CLAPP & EISENBERG and others
Tosin Adegbuji v. US Atty Gen, et al
as 08-4716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOSIN ADEGBUJI
Defendant - Appellee:
US ATTY GEN, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALEZ and others
John Henry v. Michael Chertoff
as 08-3221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN HENRY, AKA Frank C. Cannon
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF
George Magdy Nassif Nasr v. Thomas H. Hogan, et al
as 08-3149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE MAGDY NASSIF NASR
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security, THOMAS DECKER, Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security, THOMAS HOGAN, Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-2664
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
