Cases 11 - 20 of 27
TARANGO et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05822
Plaintiff:
CARLOS TARANGO , GREGORY ADAMS , MARY BARKSDALE and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FINN-GORSKI v. E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
as 2:2012cv02892
Plaintiff:
MARY ELIZABETH FINN-GORSKI
Defendant:
E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FINN v. E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
as 2:2012cv02891
Plaintiff:
JAMES FINN
Defendant:
E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KARRAS et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv01916
Plaintiff:
ALEX KARRAS , SUSAN CLARK , HENRY LOUIS ADAMS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOREN v. NOONAN et al
as 5:2012cv01586
Plaintiff:
EDWARD KOREN
Defendant:
FRANK NOONAN and MARIA FINN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FINN et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv01034
Plaintiff:
JIM FINN , SCOTT DRAGOS , JOE HORN and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FINN v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66439
Plaintiff:
SHEILA DENISE FINN
Defendant:
3M, ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FINN v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83666
Plaintiff:
JOSEPHINE FINN
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP., EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., THE SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FINN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv03507
Plaintiff:
TAMIKA FINN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN DOE, SERGEANT, JOHN DOE, CAPTAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROYAL v. FINN et al
as 2:2009cv05668
Plaintiff:
HOZAY ROYAL
Defendant:
BRIAN FINN, DONALD MARSHALL and GREGORY STUMPO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
