Cases 21 - 30 of 41
MEEKINS v. DOC's GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2018cv00851
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAZZ MEEKINS
Defendant:
DOC's GRATERFORD, JOHN AND JANE DOE, J. HAWK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
KRAMBECK et al v. FISHBONE et al
as 2:2017cv03934
Plaintiff:
BEN KRAMBECK and CLAIM DOC, LLC
Defendant:
DAVID FISHBONE and NEEDHAM BUSINESS CONSULTING, PA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOC BURNSTEIN'S ICE CREAM LAB, INC. v. THE ICE CREAM LAB, INC.
as 5:2016cv03865
Plaintiff:
DOC BURNSTEIN'S ICE CREAM LAB, INC.
Defendant:
THE ICE CREAM LAB, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
NEEDHAM BUSINESS CONSULTING PA, LLC et al v. CLAIM DOC, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv06868
Plaintiff:
NEEDHAM BUSINESS CONSULTING PA, LLC and DAVID FISHBONE
Defendant:
CLAIM DOC, LLC and BEN KRAMBECK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHIMENTI et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT CORRECTIONS (DOC) et al
as 2:2015cv03333
Plaintiff:
SALVATORE CHIMENTI , DANIEL LEYVA and DAVID MALDONADO
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT CORRECTIONS (DOC) , JOHN WETZEL , PAUL NOEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOYD v. DOC CENTRAL OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2015cv02561
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEONARD FLOYD
Defendant:
DOC CENTRAL OFFICE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOYD v. DOC-SCI CHESTER
as 2:2014cv05470
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEONARD FLOYD
Defendant:
DOC-SCI CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOYD v. SHIRLEY LAWS SMITH MEDICAL et al
as 2:2014cv05142
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEONARD FLOYD
Defendant:
SHIRLEY LAWS SMITH MEDICAL, PHILLIPS, STOUZMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
