Cases 21 - 30 of 150
COOPER v. TOWNSHIP OF RIDLEY, PENNSYLVANIA POLICE OFFICERS et al
as 2:2019cv05176
Plaintiff:
DERRICK COOPER
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF RIDLEY, PENNSYLVANIA POLICE OFFICERS, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE, RICHARD ROE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERRARO v. JUUL LABS INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04979
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATION #1-25, JANE ROES #1-25, JOHN DOES #1-25 and others
Plaintiff:
GIOVANNI FERRARO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROSE v. PAWLOWSKI et al
as 5:2019cv03853
Defendant:
RAY O'CONNELL, ED PAWLOWSKI, JOHN DOE AND JANE ROE, INC., and others
Plaintiff:
JIMI ROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02881
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
ROE et al v. LIVENT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv02683
Defendant:
PAUL W. GRAVES, GILBERTO ANTONIAZZI, PIERRE R. BRONDEAU and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY ROE
Petitioner:
LIVENT INVESTOR GROUP, THE PUERTO RICO EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE PUERTO RICO ELECTRIC POWER AUTHORITY, YULIANG ZHANG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03692
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DOE et al v. ARMSTRONG
as 2:2018cv01263
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE , RICHARD ROE and ABC COMPANY
Defendant:
MARTIN ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ABREU v. PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. et al
as 5:2017cv04171
Plaintiff:
ANDRON ABREU
Defendant:
PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. , ASHLEY SEAMAN , NICOLE STEMLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
