Cases 31 - 40 of 154
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SMITH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv03985
Plaintiff:
EDWIN SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN MCDERMOTT, STEPHEN VIVARINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FENTON v. MCDERMOTT
as 2:2013cv00741
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL J. FENTON
Defendant:
MARK MCDERMOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WOODS v. PETTINE et al
as 2:2012cv05608
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WOODS
Defendant:
CARMEN D. PETTINE, DANIEL WALLOWER, JERE GOODMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCDERMOTT v. BOROUGH OF COLWYN, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2012cv03411
Plaintiff:
PLUNKETT MCDERMOTT
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF COLWYN, PENNSYLVANIA , TONETTE PRAY , JOHN CACCIUTTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
MCDERMOTT v. PICKINS et al
as 2:2011cv07343
Petitioner:
JOSEPH MCDERMOTT
Respondent:
PICKINS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILA, PA. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCDERMOTT v. BENEFICIAL MUTUAL BANCORP, INC.
as 2:2011cv07288
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MCDERMOTT
Defendant:
BENEFICIAL MUTUAL BANCORP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
VEST et al v. ALLIED PACKING & SUPPLY, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67661
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY VEST and CAROLINE VEST
Defendant:
ALLIED PACKING & SUPPLY, INC., ALTA BUILDING MATERIALS CO. , CYPRUS AMAX MINERALS COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY v. MCDERMOTT
as 2:2011cv05508
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
PATRICK MCDERMOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
