Cases 41 - 50 of 1,494
JOHNSON et al v. CLAYHURST et al
as 2:2021cv04156
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON, LESSIE POWELL, RASHID POWELL and others
Defendant:
HAROLD CLAYHURST, JILL BRADY, GORDON GALLAGHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALCANTARA et al v. DURAN LANDSCAPING, INC.
as 2:2021cv03947
Plaintiff:
BYRON ALCANTARA, LUIS ROBERTO RUIZ VELASQUEZ and RAYMUNDO HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
DURAN LANDSCAPING, INC. doing business as DURAN LANDSCAPING & HARDSCAPING, LLC doing business as DURANS LANDSCAPING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 20
Crespo Hernandez v. Government Employees Insurance Company
as 5:2021cv03242
Lead Plaintiff:
Damian Crespo Hernandez
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company doing business as GEICO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
COIT v. SORBER et al
as 2:2021cv01568
Defendant:
JAIME SORBER, OLIVERI, GILLARDS and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ramos et al v. Sejersen et al
as 5:2021cv00276
Defendant:
Mark A Sejersen and CHARLES J. HUSTED, INC.
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Hernandez and Elba Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HIDALGO VILLAFANE et al v. AGUSTAWESTLAND PHILDELPHIA CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv06393
Defendant:
AGUSTAWESTLAND PHILDELPHIA CORPORATION, LEONARDO S.p.A. and AGUSTAWESTLAND PHILADELPHIA CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
LOURDES FRANCISCA MENDOZA HERNANDEZ, MARTHA JULIA HIDALGO VILLAFANE and MA. GUADALUPE NANCY CANALES ELIZALDE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
