Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
DUBOSE et al v. U.S ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2024cv01542
Plaintiff: ABDUSH DUBOSE, ZUMAR DUBOSE and KARIEM DUBOSE
Defendant: U.S ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv03962
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
KORNAFEL v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02292
Defendant: U.S. POSTAL SERVICE and U.S. GOVERNMENT
Plaintiff: STANLEY E. KORNAFEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CORTEZ et al v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2014cv03144
Plaintiff: DARLENE CORTEZ
Defendant: U.S. POSTAL SERVICE , INSPECTOR X , BACCARAT and others
Movant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
WHEELER v. ULNSY et al
as 2:2011cv01868
Plaintiff: AARON CHRISTOPHER WHEELER
Defendant: KIM ULNSY , MICHAEL SPENCER , U.S. POSTAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
DALIESSIO v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2010cv04649
Plaintiff: LORRAINE G. DALIESSIO
Defendant: U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
MACKAY v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2008cv02871
Plaintiff: DONALD FRANCIS MACKAY, JR.
Defendant: U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01276
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
RICHES v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv04009
Plaintiff: JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant: U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER, FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?