Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Snyder v. Warden of Franklin County Jail et al
as 4:2021cv01095
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Warden of Franklin County Jail
Petitioner:
Toby Wayne Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Speraw v. Catone et al
as 1:2018cv02310
Defendant:
Shanna Cox, Gary Eichelberger, Toby Catone and others
Plaintiff:
David Nelson Speraw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toby v. Lamas et al
as 3:2013cv02882
Petitioner:
Dennis Toby
Respondent:
Marirosa Lamas and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Younica et al v. Princeton Tower Development Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv00026
Plaintiff:
George Younica and John Hazen
Defendant:
Princeton Tower Development Corporation and Toby Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Newsome v. Catone et al
as 3:2012cv02475
Plaintiff:
Brenton Boyd Newsome
Defendant:
Toby Catone, Prime Care Medical Inc., York County Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. County of York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2012cv01564
Plaintiff:
Israel West
Defendant:
County of York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, York County Prison, Mary Sabol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Navedo v. PrimeCare Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00888
Plaintiff:
Carla Navedo
Defendant:
PrimeCare Medical, Inc. , Pamela Rollings-Mazza , Aimee Leipart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. PrimeCare Medical Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00292
Plaintiff:
Tracy Raynard Bradley
Defendant:
PrimeCare Medical Inc. , Toby Cantone , Phil for PMC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernandez v. Reihart et al
as 1:2012cv00278
Plaintiff:
Orlando Fernandez
Defendant:
Donald Reihart, John/Jane Doe Rogers, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toby v. Mazerkiwicz et al
as 3:2011cv00075
Petitioner:
Dennis Toby
Respondent:
Joseph Mazerkiwicz and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.