Cases 11 - 20 of 57
PIT STOP EXPRESS LLC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv01184
Plaintiff:
PIT STOP EXPRESS LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RAUTERKUS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00240
Defendant:
DENISE COLEMAN, NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
MARIA RAUTERKUS and DAVID V. RAUTERKUS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
SHAH et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv00782
Plaintiff:
MANINDER SINGH, KAMLESH SHAH, SWATI SHAH and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 202
PLEASANT RIDGE MANOR v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
as 1:2019cv00104
Plaintiff:
PLEASANT RIDGE MANOR
Defendant:
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
KENNEDY v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv00153
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LEHIGH PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, DAVID J. MACMAIN and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RANIER'S RX LABORATORY, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00111
Defendant:
FRANCIS H. RANIER and RANIER'S RX LABORATORY, INC.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TRIANGLE MART, INC. et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2018cv01334
Plaintiff:
MATHILDA SINGH, NEERAJA YARIAGADDA and TRIANGLE MART, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MAEVE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2018mc00812
Plaintiff:
JESSICA D'ANU MAEVE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. COLLINS
as 2:2018cv01069
Defendant:
RICHARD COLLINS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545
CHESBRO v. MARTIN
as 1:2018cv00088
Plaintiff:
MARSHA M. CHESBRO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
