Cases 121 - 130 of 11,800
Richard v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
CARL RICHARD
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH, WELLPATH MEDICAL CO., DR. MUHAMMAD NAJI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00262
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
SHASTEEN v. BARTLETT
as 1:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
DAKOTA SHASTEEN
Respondent:
WARDEN BARTLETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
VIERA v. BARLETT
as 1:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
WIGBERTO VIERA
Respondent:
S. BARLETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
LITTLEJOHN v. BARLETT
as 1:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
DONTA D. LITTLEJOHN
Respondent:
WARDEN S. BARLETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SEWELL v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2024cv00082
Petitioner:
PAUL SAMUEL SEWELL
Respondent:
MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HALLE v. PARKER et al
as 2:2024cv00581
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HALLE
Respondent:
JUSTIN PARKER and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BEY v. MCCRADY et al
as 2:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
ZAMA ELOAH BEY
Defendant:
JENNIFER MCCRADY and ATTORNEY LISA VANQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 3:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
DASHAAN R. SMITH
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT KLINEFELTER, SGT. SIPES, SGT. VERESHACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
