Cases 11 - 20 of 11,800
TIPTON v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
SKY TIPTON
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER, DAVID CLOSE, MICHELLE IVICIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HENSLEY v. SWANSON
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HENSLEY
Defendant:
ALICIA SWANSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ODEN v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2024cv00797
Plaintiff:
KALEIB ODEN
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON, SGT BLACK, CO BREMMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
BOWERS v. CLARK et al
as 2:2024cv00803
Petitioner:
BRANDON BOWERS
Respondent:
Superintendent Gina Clark and PETER C. ACKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NAPPER v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
TYWAN NAPPER
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CLARK v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CLARK DOUGLAS III
Defendant:
ZAKEN and BUZAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
ALVIN MELVILLE THOMAS
Respondent:
WARDEN UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SAVU v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
MIRCEA DAN SAVU
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
TROUTMAN v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00791
Petitioner:
DONALD TROUTMAN
Defendant:
WARDEN DAUPHIN COUNTY PRISON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
