Cases 21 - 30 of 11,768
BRUNNER v. GILSON et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY BRUNNER
Defendant:
ALYSSA GILSON and KRISTIN MCHENRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STANKO v. USA
as 2:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
THOMAS GEORGE STANKO
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
DOE v. CRISTINI et al
as 2:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
R. CRISTINI, E. HURD, D. COULEHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RUBINOSKI v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al.
as 2:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
MISTER KENNETH RUBINOSKI
Defendant:
PA IG ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
HAMILTON v. BROTHERS et al
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
SHAWN HAMILTON
Defendant:
MARK BROTHERS, AMY VARNER and DONALD BECHOTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. WASHINGTON et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
LEONARD BROWN
Defendant:
WARDEN M. WASHINGTON, SOE VENELLI, CMC ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
SCHAEFER v. PA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2024cv00317
Petitioner:
IVAN SCHAEFER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDANT OF SCI MERCER, PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENDERSON v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Petitioner:
BOBBIE HENDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN, FCI & FCP MCKEAN and CMC ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
STOCKTON v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN and ROSS P. BUSCEMI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
