Cases 61 - 70 of 163
COSTON v. KIRBY et al
as 3:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
RASHOD D. COSTON
Defendant:
MARK A. KIRBY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHINER v. KIRBY et al
as 3:2014cv00220
Petitioner:
MARC D. SHINER
Respondent:
MARK A. KIRBY and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
TSARNAEV v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2014cv00766
Petitioner:
DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS and BARACK OBAMA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KALU v. WIGEN et al
as 3:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
KALU KALU
Defendant:
GEORGE WIGEN, P. JUSTER, SCOTT BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
DANIEL KEITH MATTHEWS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CENTRAL MEDICAL REVIEW DIRECTOR, FPC MCKEAN HEALTH SERVICES ADMIN. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTHEWS v. MEEKS et al
as 2:2014cv00009
Petitioner:
DANIEL KEITH MATTHEWS
Respondent:
BOBBY L. MEEKS and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
KALU v. WIGEN et al
as 3:2013cv00274
Plaintiff:
KALU KALU
Defendant:
GEORGE WIGEN, P. JUSTER, SCOTT BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv01615
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, BEN LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANT v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2013cv00210
Petitioner:
ANDRE E. GRANT
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, G. C. WIGENS, ERIC HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GRAY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2013cv01203
Plaintiff:
GERALD GRAY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
