Cases 1 - 10 of 11,819
LESANE v. FCI MCKEAN WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
ERIC JAMEL LESANE
Defendant:
FCI MCKEAN WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
LANE v. RUCINSKI
as 2:2024cv00894
Plaintiff:
MR. DUSTIN HYRUM LANE
Defendant:
STATE TROOPER MATTHEW RUCINSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITE v. CORRECTIONS OFFICER HURL
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS WHITE
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER HURL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
MURPHY v. MEDLIN et al
as 2:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY J. MURPHY
Defendant:
JULIE C. MEDLIN, TRACY ALVORD, BRAD ZIMMERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. BOOKER et al
as 2:2024cv00870
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN HYRUM LANE
Defendant:
BETH BOOKER, ABIGAIL CONKLIN, JOYCE A. HATFIELD-WISE, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BEAN v. WARDEN SCI FOREST et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Petitioner:
DARELLE BEAN
Respondent:
WARDEN SCI FOREST, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLACKWELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00872
Petitioner:
NORMAN BLACKWELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
URBANO v. ACJ et al
as 2:2024cv00874
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. URBANO
Respondent:
ACJ and ACTING WARDEN SHANE DADY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
FOREMAN v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2024cv00137
Petitioner:
WILLIAM FOREMAN
Respondent:
M. UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SERFASS v. JAMES et al
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
JAMES SERFASS
Defendant:
CASEY JAMES, DEANNA DELLATORRED, PATRICK NAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
