Cases 1 - 9 of 9
WILLIAMS v. WOLF,et al
as 3:2020cv00061
Defendant:
S. HNATKOVICH, M. STRAW, THERON PEREZ and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DOBSON v. ACTING WARDEN OF THE FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION MCKEAN-RESPONDENT-THE PERSON HAVING CUSTODY OF THE COMPLAINANT
as 1:2019cv00016
Petitioner:
KASEEN DOBSON
Respondent:
ACTING WARDEN OF THE FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION MCKEAN-RESPONDENT-THE PERSON HAVING CUSTODY OF THE COMPLAINANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILEY v. WARDEN FCI McKEAN
as 1:2018cv00363
Defendant:
ACTING WARDEN OF THE FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION MCKEAN-RESPONDENT-THE PERSON HAVING CUSTODY OF THE COMPLAINANT
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE WILEY, JR.
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JOHNSON v. PERSON
as 2:2016cv01369
Plaintiff:
JAMIEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN N. PERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2015cv00217
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JONES
Defendant:
KENNETH CAMERON, NAJI, DEBRA YOUNKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2015cv00714
Plaintiff:
AARON THOMPSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, R. A. PURDUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2014cv00258
Plaintiff:
DONALD TURNER
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., MARK KIRBY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. CAPOZZI et al
as 2:2011cv00433
Plaintiff:
LANCE M. WHITE
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CAPOZZI and AT LEAST 10 UNNAMED DEFENDANTS TO BE JOINED UPON RECEIPT OF PERSONAL INFORMATION SUCH AS ADDRESSES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATHIS v. VESHECCO et al
as 1:2008cv00002
Plaintiff:
SHANNON LAMONT MATHIS
Defendant:
JAMES S. VESHECCO, MARSHALL J PICCININI, DANOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
