Cases 11 - 16 of 16
PICONE v. NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2015cv01057
Plaintiff:
ADAM PICONE
Defendant:
NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTIONAL CENTER and U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. N.O.R.T.A.F./N.O.R.T.U.F et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2015cv00153
Plaintiff:
JARRON DARVEZ JACKSON
Defendant:
N.O.R.T.A.F./N.O.R.T.U.F, CITY OF EVANSTON, CITY OF ERIE BUREAU OF POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BRONSON v. U.S. MARSHAL et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2010cv00021
Plaintiff:
PURCELL BRONSON
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHAL and U.S. MARSHAL'S SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. U.S. MARSHAL'S SERVICE HEADQUARTERS et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2009cv00349
Plaintiff:
RODERICK F. BAILEY
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHAL'S SERVICE HEADQUARTERS and RUSTIC
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
TILLEY v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2009cv00299
Plaintiff:
LACY E. TILLEY, JR.
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL, RAMON RUSTIN, LANCE BOHN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SOLANA v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 3:2007cv00084
Petitioner:
GERARDO SOLANA
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, M. MILLWARD and U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.